Week 1 Mini Project - RAG Foundations Lab
Pre-reading: Foundations Overview · 01 RAG Debugging and Quality
This mini project gives Week 1 a runnable baseline. It uses only the Python standard library so you
can focus on the pipeline shape: source data, chunking, retrieval, grounded answers, token
budgeting, and long-context summarization.
What You Will Build
| Capability |
Output |
| Prompt builder |
Context-aware prompt text |
| Chunker |
Document slices with IDs |
| Retriever |
Ranked chunks for a query |
| Grounded answerer |
Answer plus citations |
| Long-doc summarizer |
Map-reduce style summary |
How to Run
cd docs/03-mini-projects/code/week01-rag-foundations
# Ask a question
python3 cli.py query "How do I reset an expired API key?"
# Summarize long text from stdin
echo "Long document text here." | python3 cli.py summarize
# Run tests
python3 -m pytest tests/ -v
Portfolio Structure
code/week01-rag-foundations/
├── chunker.py
├── retriever.py
├── grounding.py
├── summarizer.py
├── cli.py
├── corpus.json
└── tests/test_rag.py
What to Modify Across the Week
| Day |
Suggested change |
| Day 1 |
Change the system prompt and inspect token estimates. |
| Day 2 |
Add stronger refusal and output constraints. |
| Day 3 |
Change chunk size and compare retrieval ranking. |
| Day 4 |
Change citation formatting and context ordering. |
| Day 5 |
Log one failure and classify the root cause. |
| Day 6 |
Replace the long document text and compare summaries. |
| Day 7 |
Create a one-page debugging checklist from your notes. |
Starter Assets
Matching Lab Outputs
| Output |
Why keep it |
| Retrieval ranking snapshot |
Helps explain why an answer failed or succeeded |
| Token estimate summary |
Connects design decisions to cost and latency |
| Failure record |
Becomes a regression test seed |
| Long-doc summary |
Shows handling of context compression |
Portfolio Checklist
| Item |
Done? |
| Save one retrieval result with chunk IDs and citations. |
[ ] |
| Save one failed query case and root-cause notes. |
[ ] |
| Capture one chunk-size comparison and trade-off summary. |
[ ] |
| Write one STAR-ready bullet using this project evidence. |
[ ] |